Why is restitution more commonly required for probationers than for incarcerated individuals?

Restitution is more commonly required for probationers primarily because they usually maintain access to employment opportunities in the community while serving their probation. This ability to earn an income allows probationers to make financial payments to victims as part of their restitution obligations. Being employed enables them to take responsibility for their actions and provide compensation for the harm caused, which is a critical aspect of rehabilitation in the probation system.

In contrast, incarcerated individuals typically have limited or no access to employment opportunities outside of prison work programs. Even when they do work while incarcerated, the income is often minimal and serves primarily to cover costs associated with their stay in prison or to provide for personal supplies. As a result, they are less able to pay restitution to victims during their incarceration period, making it less feasible to impose similar restitution requirements on them.

Thus, the combination of access to jobs and the ability to earn money makes it more practical and common for probationers to contribute to restitution, reinforcing the rehabilitative goals of probation.