How do juvenile court judges differ from adult criminal judges in terms of their role during proceedings?

Juvenile court judges indeed take a more active part in proceedings compared to adult criminal judges. One of the primary differences between juvenile and adult court systems is the focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment. Juvenile judges often engage directly with the youth involved, making decisions that consider the best interests of the child and aiming to address their developmental needs. This active participation may include asking questions, guiding the discussions, and facilitating a dialogue that encourages accountability and personal growth rather than simply determining guilt and imposing sentences.

This hands-on approach reflects the underlying philosophy of the juvenile justice system, which is to provide support and intervention rather than just adjudication. Ultimately, the goal of the juvenile court is to redirect youth toward positive behavior and reintegration into society, often requiring a more involved judicial role to navigate the complexities of each individual case effectively.