Based on research, what is considered an acceptable threshold for how long offenders should be under RF/GPS?

The choice of six months as an acceptable threshold for how long offenders should be under radio frequency (RF) or global positioning system (GPS) monitoring is grounded in research findings that suggest this duration provides a balance between effective supervision and the ability for offenders to reintegrate into society.

Studies have indicated that shorter monitoring periods may not sufficiently deter reoffending or allow for the necessary assessment of an offender's adjustment and compliance with conditions of their supervision. On the other hand, longer monitoring durations, such as one year or more, can lead to issues such as over-surveillance, which might hinder rehabilitation by creating a sense of dependence on monitoring rather than fostering independent decision-making.

By setting the threshold at six months, it aligns with evidence suggesting this timeframe allows for meaningful supervision during critical stages of reintegration while still being manageable for both offenders and supervising authorities. This approach seeks to ensure public safety while also supporting the offenders in transitioning back into the community successfully.